Access is not eligibility
A firm can obtain every drawing it needs and still be unable to sell the part. Lawful access to technical data is one question. Whether DLA must approve the firm as a source before accepting its offer is another, and the answer is recorded in an acquisition method code and suffix on every part DLA manages.
For restricted parts the route runs through a source approval request, judged part by part, usually by a Military Service engineering activity rather than by DLA. DLA estimates a minimum of 90 days and possibly 180 or longer, and a successful package yields eligibility for future buys, not an order. A firm that misreads the code or submits the wrong category spends that time for nothing.
What the paper answers
- What do AMC 0 through 5 mean, and why does the difference between AMC 3 and AMC 5 matter to a manufacturer?
- Which suffix codes require source approval, and which close a part until the firm holds its own data?
- Which of the four SAR categories does your evidence support, and what must each package contain?
- Where does each DLA site take submissions, and in what file format?
- Which Government office decides on a new supplier of a critical safety item or a QPL-controlled product, and where does the original manufacturer fit in?
- When can the purchase-or-borrow program support a reverse engineering package?
A look inside
The category a firm selects sets the evidence its package must carry. The paper's summary of the four categories:
| Category | Who it fits | What the package adds |
|---|---|---|
| I – Actual Item | Has manufactured the exact item for an OEM, one of its subcontractors or the Government within the last three to five years, depending on criticality, and holds legal rights to the technical data | Shipping documents with evidence of customer lot acceptance, such as a signed DD Form 250 |
| II – Similar Item | Has manufactured items similar in complexity, design, criticality, materials and application, and legally holds the OEM technical data for the actual item | Similar-part drawings, shipping documents, manufacturing plan and vendor list, plus a detailed comparative analysis against the actual item |
| III – New Manufacturer | Has not made the item or a similar one, but legally holds the OEM technical data and has equal or greater manufacturing capability | A technical briefing if requested |
| IV – Reverse Engineered | Lacks the technical data and develops it by reverse engineering at its own expense | A reverse engineering manufacturing plan and a technical briefing if requested |
Table 3 from the paper. Source Approval Request Categories. Source: DLA SAR and AO Guide, November 2022.
What's inside
- The acquisition method codes and the suffix codes a new supplier meets most often, with the practical effect of each.
- A three-check test for sorting any candidate part into open, data-limited and approval-limited.
- The twenty lettered SAR package elements mapped to each category, and the three elements UDC regards as the ones to get right first.
- Submission points, timelines and the pitfalls DLA's guide flags for new submitters, including assemblies, AMSC B permissions and recency limits.
- A table of approving authority by condition, from restricted items to aviation and ship safety parts and Qualified Products Lists, and a brief on technical data access through TDMT and JCP.
Six reference tables
Built to be kept open beside a parts list:
- Acquisition Method Codes
- Selected Acquisition Method Suffix Codes
- Source Approval Request Categories
- SAR Package Elements by Category
- SAR Submission Points
- Approving Authority by Condition
Who it's for
- Machine shops and manufacturers new to DLA that want approval to make restricted parts.
- Established suppliers expanding into source-controlled, critical safety or qualified products.
- Business development staff screening NSN lists before committing to tooling or a bid.
About the author
Chris A. Grable is founder and CEO of Up Doppler Consulting LLC, a Veteran-Owned Small Business in Leonardtown, Maryland. A Navy veteran with more than 45 years in DOW operations and acquisition, he retired from federal service as Senior Experiment Designer at the Naval Air Warfare Center Aircraft Division. UDC helps technology companies find, shape and win DOW work.
Public sources
These public references support the paper. Some repositories require navigation or an account to reach the specific document.
- DFARS PGI 217.7506, Spare Parts Breakout Program (Acquisition Method Codes and Acquisition Method Suffix Codes)
- Defense Logistics Agency Source Approval Request (SAR) and Alternate Offer (AO) Guide, November 2022
- DFARS 209.270, Aviation and Ship Critical Safety Items (DFARS Subpart 209.2)
- FAR 9.202, Policy (Qualification Requirements), paragraphs (a) and (c)
- Joint Certification Program (JCP), Defense Logistics Agency, Logistics Operations, accessed 20 September 2026
- DoDI 5230.24, Distribution Statements on DoD Technical Information, 10 January 2023
- DFARS 252.227-7013, Rights in Technical Data, Other Than Commercial Products and Commercial Services
- RPPOB: Replenishment Parts Purchase or Borrow, DLA Aviation, Engineering, accessed 3 October 2026
Three ways to get it
This paper
The full paper as a PDF. After payment, sign in at portal.updoppler.com/papers/ with your checkout email to download it.
Buy the paperClosing Rate, yearly
This paper and every other UDC paper as a PDF, plus every Closing Rate analysis. Less than the price of three papers.
Subscribe yearlyClosing Rate, monthly
The same access as the yearly plan, paid month to month.
Subscribe monthlyNeed the research tools as well? updoppler.com Tools includes the full UDC paper library along with the Federal Forecast Explorer and the DOW Acquisition Command Map. See all plans.
Questions
- Is this guide for dealers?
- No. It is written for firms seeking approval to manufacture an item. A dealer offering a part made by an already approved source is not a new manufacturing source, and the solicitation sets the terms for such offers.
- Does source approval guarantee business?
- No. DLA's guidance is explicit that approval grants the opportunity to compete for and supply the item in future procurements, not contracts, orders or any level of business.
- Is this legal advice?
- No. It is a practitioner's guide built on DFARS, the FAR and DLA's published guidance. The recommendations are UDC's own, not DLA requirements.
- I already subscribe to Closing Rate. Do I need to buy it?
- No. Paid Closing Rate subscribers get the full PDF with the Closing Rate article.
- Can I talk to someone about a specific opportunity?
- Yes. Contact Up Doppler Consulting.

